I was talking to a buddy on the phone yesterday and I
confessed, “I am more Catholic cheerleader than apologist.”
When I watch apologists debate the Catholic and Protestant
sides, I feel like I am watching an unbearably long Ping-Pong match without any
record of score. Each observer has to imagine the score in his own head.
Don’t get me wrong, I believe apologetics is a very
important discipline, and I have great respect for those who engage in this
essential ministry professionally. Many a seeker has made a definitive choice
for the Catholic Church because the case for Catholicism was well argued and
systematically presented. I have learned a great deal from the likes of Patrick
Madrid, Jimmy Akin, and Michelle Arnold, brilliant apologists all.
Also, I believe that every Catholic should be able to
articulate his faith well enough to present a logical and reasonable defense of
Catholic doctrine, especially in these relativistic times when truth seems up
for grabs and logic and reason are a rare commodity, obscured as they are by
rampant emotionalism and banal sentimentality.
But when it comes down to me, my primary drive is to
evangelize the disengaged, or the lightly engaged, of the fold. Perhaps this is
because I found myself astounded upon my entry into the Church at twenty-nine
years old, and following a life of impoverished agnosticism, by the many
Catholics who seemed bored by the Faith. I was like a starving man that looks
on in wonder as other hungry people sit before piles of the most exquisite food
without partaking.